by: Orion Karl Daley
When thinking of Albert Einstein’s E=MC2, have you considered the other context for representing matter. That is, having matter represented as ‘energy which oscillates based on the speed of light squared’. Specifically, besides matter being solid, can you imagine it simultaneously being described as a unique reference frame of some relative mass composed of energy and time where Fq =amplitude E/ velocity C2?
Could you imagine the Sun and Earth in this context? That is, to think of them in terms of relative masses; and then with respect to each other !
Regardless of how we imagine them, the Sun and Earth we know have some form of an individual field strength for their unique gravity. And then, what is the nature of their shared gravity?
As unique reference frames of asynchronous time with respect to each other, would you consider that a point of where the Sun’s and Earth’s gravitational fields could coalesce, in lets say a point of relative equilibrium, can be calculated?
The point is calculated below and identified to be just next door to the Magnetosphere where the solar winds interact with Earth. That is, the point appears to be in the Exosphere. This calculation is done in the following:
Relative Equilibrium between the Sun and Earth represents a measure of equivalence in their mutual space:
for example: Matter 1/Distance 2 = Matter 2/Distance 1
This is where distances Distance 1 and Distance 2 are derived as:
(total distance)/(total mass) * M1 = Distance 2 . .
and . . * M2 = Distance 1
Applied for the Sun and Earth is in the following:
The Earth’s RE (5.97223 * 1024kg/ 452.4967391km)
= The Sun’s RE (1.99 * 1030kg/ 150656972.5km)
At the point of reference, and at the speed of light, the Sun and Earth’s gravitational fields are thought to coalesce:
Earth’s Relative Force @ 1.003507 * 1046 ( kg/km )
= Sun’sRf @ 1.003507 * 1046 ( kg/km )
Unlike for Kepler’s center of mass seesaw , the above formula calculates a point of relative equilibrium that is supposed to be located 452 km’s above the surface of the Earth.
In fact, it is supposed to calculate a point of net zero between any two relative masses. It can also represent another or third reference frame derived from others; and similar to Newton’s G, it is intended to be applicable to all solar bodies.
As distance and kinetic energy appear to be inversely proportional, it can also act as a moving constant for acceleration based on the state of kinetic change with
respect to distance between bodies.
 |
Would you be willing to speculate that the relative masses for the Sun and Earth could share a syncopated state of superposition. That is, consisting of a synchronistic event with respect to their field’s harmonics and amplitude: or frequency Zr = amplitude/distance as a third reference frame?
Like the magnetosphere and solar winds, the relationship of kinetic force between the Sun and Earth can be represented as a relative mass at the speed of light: E/C. In other words, the speed of light as an absolute average of C2, can represent a shared fundamental between the Sun and Earth as relative masses.
( ESun/C2 >>>~~~{ E Kinetic Zr /C }~~~<<< EEarth/C2 )
Being a third reference frame, as a relative mass consisting of E Kinetic Zr /C, it is considered derived from, and shared as a synchonistic event between the asynchronous reference frames of the Sun and Earth.
What is considered synchronous is also a matter of phase. This is where phase shift can represent delay in terms of a current’s impedance. Extending Faraday’s view’s, could we speculate that a 900 shift for the electromagnetic could represent the nature of gravity as some form of an electrical force?
If this is the case, then the Sun and Earth in superposition could be perpetually seeking ground through the other as mutual alternating currents at some frequency Zr
If you could imagine the universe this way, you might want the Essay on Relative Gravity. Its Published at: LuLu.com
