Since school days, I have been fascinated by observing symmetry among-st things. Although they could appear to be totally unrelated, I would observe certain shared principles that would apply to both.
What I learned early on is that symmetry can be observed in nature. This also applies to its observer. Further, in observation, we must also remember that in what we observe we are also limited in perspective to what we are a part of.
What is called Unification Theory, and generally associated with Albert Einstein and some other scientists, attempted to explain this symmetry in terms of Physics . This was for describing what it refers to as the four forces and how they relate;and with respect to the Big Bang theory.
General consensus is that unification theory itself needs further coherence. This is where Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, String Theory and Classical Mechanics all have a well founded place in it.
To describe the Mechanics of the Universe, I made an object oriented design for unification theory where abstract properties in nature such as force can be realized in concrete ways.
Defining an object oriented paradigm for Unification Theory allows Relative Gravity, as theory, to address the symmetry of the four forces in a coherent way. Relative Gravity’s view is in terms of the inheritance and polymorphism of shared properties with respect to concrete realizations. An example is the abstract definition of Force such as F=MA, and then concrete examples where M & A are implied but not implicit in definition.
In fact, for scope, the nature of Evolution is viewed in Relative Gravity as objected oriented. Polymorphism is considered to assure creation where all things are viewed perennial in their own time. Physical properties are considered conserved through polymorphism. Due to this, the nature of gravity itself as abstract properties, in evolution, such as in the Big Bang is considered shared.
The Theory of Relative Gravity does not necessarily conflict with accepted theory but offers a different perspective through its interpretation. For example, before it can be interpreted in application, time itself is first an abstract concept in being common to all things.
With respect to time, Relative Gravity addresses a simple paradox between Quantum Mechanics, General Theory of Relativity and the relationship between certainty and uncertainty. For QM, any object, which also includes its most fundamental abstract basis, is thought to be in all possible states. The ‘measurement itself, such as Einstein’ ‘Speed of Light’, is considered the cause of the object to be limited to any single possibility’; or a point of observation.
Relative Gravity accounts for the limitations of the perspective, that we are part of. Generally accepted, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. That is, in how we know the context of matter. But for Relative Gravity, like time, matter can also be known in other ways.
Like time, the nature of force is viewed first as a relative force that is considered inherent in concrete expressions as one or in combination of the four known. Relative Gravity simply puts Nature in an object oriented framework, where based on context, any accepted scientific following can generally apply.
To suit Object Oriented Design with respect to the Principles of Conservation, to view the Universe in the form of alternating currents, like an alternator, all properties can be considered conserved in expression. In this way, Relative Gravity sees the characteristics of Nature in a similar manner to household AC current.
The fundamental universe is considered to consist of plasmas of alternating currents where seen as having neither a beginning nor an end. They are considered derived as reference frames from other reference frames of current where the inheritance of properties, and therefore symmetry can be conserved through polymorphism.
Based on Relative Gravity’s point of view, the most fundamental measurement that we will ever be able to make is with alternating currents. That is, as alternating currents represent fundamental expressions of energy in time and dimension, without which our universe would have no volition; and with alternating currents as its continuum, most likely the universe does expand but also contract!
For Relative Gravity, this fundamental expression of current is considered a derivative of other origins where there is no single one. Alternating currents can be on either side of causality as both cause and effect. The singularity is seen simply as a further derivative of some other origin in a fabric of many that can be the cause of big bangs.
In this manner, the theory of Relative Gravity provides a model for the Universe where means of measure between heavenly bodies, particles and other things is generalized and then based on context.
For example, Relative Gravity refers to a manifold for describing a singularity or a big bang as a generalized body with some dimension ‘X,Y, and Z’. The singularity and its observed Big Bang as a body are considered the same inertial frame of reference except having a different perspective for each.
To describe symmetry, Relative Gravity wraps an object oriented frame work around the nature of generalized bodies. This is in terms of abstract properties where bodies are first normalized in context. For example, the property of impedance applies to the measure of any type of current or force that the body in question represents.
For bodies, Newton’s formula has been the mainstay for measuring Gravity. His constant’ G’ though offers challenges when trying to apply elsewhere than for Earth. Kepler’s center of gravity can explain logically where the scale is balanced between the Earth and the Sun, but does not account for a- other heavenly bodies nor b , their actual placement with respect to their solar orbits which could affect the initial assumptions between the Earth and the Sun.
Relative Gravity provides an alternative means for measuring Gravity. It offers reasonable explanation for the orbital’s of heavenly bodies. RG also explains why planets do rotate in their orbits more over than just offering some explanation called centrifugal force.
Relative Gravity’s basic formula is an interpretation of Newton’s force and Einstein’s view on the interchangeability of energy and matter. The equivalent of Newton’s constant ‘G’ is referred to as Relative Equilibrium and expressed as M1/D2=M2/D1.
credits: http://www.hickerphoto.com/images/600/northern-lights.jpg
Distances D1 and D2 are derived as: R (total distance) /total mass * M1 = D2; and then for M2, it equals D1. Where Distances D1 and D2 meet if applied to the Earth’s orbit is calculated near or where the Electromagnetic storm takes place between it and the Sun.
Relative Gravity further offers new perspectives on things which hopefully will eventually be accepted as a benefit to Science. Its points of view include Black Holes being seen as AC generators. This is while also explaining the mechanics of Solar Systems, and with respect to the galaxies that they are in, and the relationships that peer galaxies can contend while providing a means for calculating Atomic Mass Units when addressing the fundamentals of matter that all this ultimately refers to.
======================================
Particle Physics, solids, liquid and gases, kinetic theory of matter, super string theory, quantum gravity, quantum field theory, cosmology, and particle phenomenology. Atom, atomic physics, Black Hole, Black hole, condensed matter, condensed particles, cosmology, Einstein, Force, Gravity, Hawking, high energy physics, Kepler, lattice gauge theory, Newton’s Laws, Object Oriented Science, Orion Daley, Phenomenology, Relative Equilibrium, Relative Force, Relative Gravity, Relativity, Science, Scientific Theory, Atom, atomic physics, Black Hole, condensed particle, cosmology, electron, Force, gravitational force, Gravity, Hawking, high energy physics, lattice gauge theory, M theory, neutron physics, neutrino, neutron, object oriented, Object Oriented Science, particle physics, Phenomenology, physics, proton, Relative Distance, Relative Equilibrium, Relative Force, Relative Gravity, solar system, string theory
About the Theory of Relative Gravity 
